Homework 04

2. Winding number

Suppose \(f(z)\) is holomorphic in the disc \(|z| ≤ ϵ\) and has a zero at \(z = 0\) but nowhere else in the disc \(|z| ≤ ϵ\). Show by direct integration that

\[ \frac{1}{2πi} \int_{|z|=ϵ} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} dz \]

equals the winding number of the argument of f around the circle \(|z| = ϵ\). Then use the residue theorem to show that this equals the degree of the zero, in agreement with the argument principle.

The integral

\[ \int_{C} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} dz = \int_{C} \frac{1}{f(z)} df(z) = \int_{f(C)} \frac{1}{w} dw \]

effectively measures the total change in the argument of \(f(z)\) as \(z\) traverses the circle, which equals the winding number of the argument of \(f\).

Since \(f(z)\) is holomorphic in the disc \(|z| \leq \epsilon\) and has a zero at \(z = 0\), \(f(z)\) can be locally expressed as \(z^n g(z)\), where \(n\) is the degree of the zero.

Then, \(f'(z) = n z^{n−1} g(z) + z^n g'(z)\), and so

\[ \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} = \frac{n}{z} + \frac{g'(z)}{g(z)} \]

The residue at \(z=0\) is the coefficient of \(\frac{1}{z}\) in this expression, which is \(n\), the degree of the zero.

4. Analytic continuation and Fourier coefficents

Give an analytic continuation of \(\cos θ\) from the unit circle \(z = e^{iθ}\) to the complex plane minus the origin.

Conclude that the Fourier coefficients \(c_n\) of \(e^{- \cos θ}\) decrease faster than any exponential, meaning \(c_n = o(e^{−αn})\) for all \(α\) as \(n → ±∞\). Compare this to the Fourier series of \(1/(cos θ −3/2)\), what is the decay of its Fourier coefficents?

Analytic continuation

On the unit circle \(z=e ^ {iθ}\), \(\cos \theta = \frac{1}{2} (e^{iθ} +e^{−iθ}) = \frac{1}{2} (z+ z^{-1})\). This expression provides an analytic continuation of \(\cos \theta\) to the complex plane minus the origin, as it is well-defined for all \(z \neq 0\).

Fourier coefficents of \(e^{−\cos \theta}\)

The function \(e^{−\cos \theta}\) is smooth and periodic. The Fourier coefficients \(c_n\) of a periodic function \(f(θ)\) are given by:

\[ c_n= 1/2π ∫_{0}^{2π} f(θ)e^{inθ}dθ = 1/2π \int_{0}^{2π} e^{-\cos θ + i n θ}dθ \]

\[ 1/2π \int_{0}^{2π} e^{-\cos θ + i n θ} dθ = 1/2π \int_{|z|=1} e^{-z/2-1/2z} z^n \frac{dz}{i z} = Res_{z=0} { e^{-z/2-1/2z} z^{n-1} } \]

The coefficient \(a_{-n}\) of \(g(z)=e^{-z/2-1/2z}\) at the point of \(z=0\) can de derived by expanding by separately \(e^{-z/2}\) as Talyor Series and \(e^{−1/(2z)}\) as a Laurent Series and then multiplying these series together

\[ a_{-n} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-\frac{1}{2})^k \frac{1}{k!} (-\frac{1}{2})^{(n+k)} \frac{1}{(n+k)!} \]

So fourier coefficients \(c_n\)

\[ c_n = a_{-n} \leq |a_{-n} | \leq \frac{1}{2^{n}}\frac{1}{n!} \]

decrease faster than any exponential.

Fourier coefficents of \(\frac{1}{\cos \theta - 3/2}\)

The Fourier coefficients \(c_n\) of a periodic function \(f(θ)\) are given by:

\[ \begin{aligned} c_n &= \frac{1}{2π} \int_{0}^{2π} f(θ)e^{inθ}dθ \\ &= \frac{1}{2π} \int_{0}^{2π} \frac{1}{\cos \theta - 3/2}e^{i n θ}dθ \\ &= \frac{1}{2πi} \int_{|z| = 1} \frac{2z}{z^2-3z+1} z^{n-1} dz \end{aligned} \]

Let \(z^2 - 3z+1=(z-z_1)(z-z_2)\), where \(z_1 = \frac{1}{2} \left(3-\sqrt{5}\right), z_2=\frac{1}{2} \left(3 + \sqrt{5}\right)\).

\[ \begin{aligned} c_n &= Res_{z=z_1} \frac{2z}{(z-z_1)(z-z_2)} z^{n-1} \\ &= \frac{2 z_1}{z_1-z_2} {z_1}^{n-1} \end{aligned} \]

5. Laurent series and singularity

Let’s consider a function \(f\) that is holomorphic in a disc around \(z_0\) except at \(z_0\) itself.

  1. Removable Singularity:

    If \(f\) has a removable singularity at \(z_0\), it means that \(f\) can be extended to a holomorphic function at \(z_0\). In terms of the Laurent series, this implies that all the coefficients \(a_n\) for \(n < 0\) are zero because it reduces to its Taylor series.

    Conversely, if all \(a_n = 0\) for \(n < 0\), the Laurent series reduces to a Taylor series, implying that \(f\) is holomorphic at \(z_0\) (since it can be expressed as a power series), and thus the singularity is removable.

  2. Pole of Order \(m\) :

    If \(f\) has a pole of order \(m\) at \(z_0\), it means that in the Laurent series, there is a term with \((z - z_0)^{-m}\) (where \(a_{-m} \neq 0\)) and no terms with higher negative powers.

    Conversely, if there is some \(m < 0\) such that \(a_m \neq 0\) but \(a_n = 0\) for all \(n < m\), then the Laurent series has a term \(a_m (z - z_0)^m\) as its term with the highest negative power, indicating a pole of order \(m\) .

  3. Essential Singularity:

    If the singularity at \(z_0\) is neither removable nor a pole, it must be an essential singularity. This is characterized by the fact that there are infinitely many negative powers of \(z - z_0\) in the Laurent series with non-zero coefficients. In other words, if the Laurent series has non-zero \(a_n\) for infinitely many \(n < 0\), then \(z_0\) is an essential singularity.

6. Euler proof of Basel problem

Using the result of the bonus problem, prove that

\[ \sin π z = \prod (1 − z/n)e^{z/n} = π z \prod (1 − z^2/n^2) \]

Then compare the Taylor series of sin πz to the first couple terms in the expansion of the infinite product to conclude

\[ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 1/n^2 = π^2/ 6 \]

According to the Weierstrass factorization theorem, an entire function can be represented as a product over its zeros. The function \(\sin \pi z\) is entire and has zeros at all integers. The product representation for \(\sin \pi z\) is given by:

\[ \sin \pi z = \pi z \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(1 - \frac{z}{n}\right)\left(1 + \frac{z}{n}\right) = \sin \pi z = \pi z \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{n^2}\right) \]

The Taylor series expansion of \(\sin \pi z\) around \(z = 0\) is:

\[ \sin \pi z = \pi z - \frac{\pi^3 z^3}{3!} + \frac{\pi^5 z^5}{5!} - \frac{\pi^7 z^7}{7!} + \cdots \]

Now, let’s expand the infinite product to the first couple of terms and keeping terms up to \(z^3\), we get:

\[ \begin{aligned} \pi z \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{n^2}\right) &= \pi z \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{1^2}\right)\left(1 - \frac{z^2}{2^2}\right)\left(1 - \frac{z^2}{3^2}\right) \cdots \\ &= \pi z \left(1 - z^2 \left(\frac{1}{1^2} + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} + \cdots\right) + \cdots \right) \end{aligned} \]

Comparing the coefficient of \(z^3\) from the Taylor series and the product expansion, we have:

\[ -\frac{\pi^3}{6} = -\pi \left(\frac{1}{1^2} + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} + \cdots\right) \]

This is the result we want.