Synergistic Influence of EMIC and Whistler (Chorus) Waves on Radiation Belt Electron Flux Dynamics

PhD Candidate: Zijin Zhang

Abstract

Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whistler (chorus) waves are fundamental plasma wave phenomena in Earth’s magnetosphere, influencing the dynamics of radiation belts through interactions with energetic electrons. Electron interactions with these waves often lead to significant modulation of electron fluxes, with chorus waves accelerating electrons to relativistic energies (Miyoshi et al. 2003) and EMIC & chorus waves causing electron losses through pitch angle scattering (Summers and Thorne 2003; Summers, Ni, and Meredith 2007b). This project aims to deepen the understanding of how these waves, in concert with other phenomena like plasma sheet injections, impact the behavior of radiation belt electrons during storm-time events. Leveraging extensive datasets from satellites such as the Van Allen Probes, ERG (Arase), MMS, and ELFIN, we will conduct a comprehensive analysis of wave properties, and the resulting effects on electron fluxes. By integrating observational data with advanced simulation techniques, the project seeks to enhance current models of radiation belt dynamics, improving predictions of space weather effects.

Background and Motivation

Interactions of Waves with Radiation Belt Electrons

Relativistic electron fluxes in Earth’s inner magnetosphere are greatly affected by electron scattering to the atmosphere via resonant interactions with whistler-mode and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves (Millan and Thorne 2007; Summers, Ni, and Meredith 2007a). Near the loss-cone, electron scattering rates for EMIC waves at such energies are much larger than for whistler-mode waves (Glauert and Horne 2005). Thus, EMIC wave-driven electron precipitation is considered a key contributor to relativistic electron losses at energies exceeding the minimum energy for cyclotron resonance with such waves, \(E_{\min}\sim 0.5-1\) MeV (Summers and Thorne 2003; Summers, Ni, and Meredith 2007b). Numerical simulations of the outer radiation belt dynamics (Ma et al. 2015) and data-model comparisons (Angelopoulos et al. 2023) have demonstrated that EMIC waves can scatter relativistic electrons efficiently and deplete their fluxes quickly in the outer radiation belt. For energies below ultra-relativistic energies (below several MeV) and for typical plasma characteristics, EMIC wave-driven electron scattering mostly affects low pitch-angle electrons (equatorial \(\alpha_{eq}<30^\circ\), see Kersten et al. 2014). Therefore, additional high pitch-angle electron scattering by whistler-mode waves is required to assist EMIC waves in the precipitation of the main, near-equatorial, (trapped) electron population (Mourenas et al. 2016). A combination of electron scattering by whistler-mode and EMIC waves at the same \(L\)-shell (even if at different MLT) can result in a very effective electron flux depletion (Mourenas et al. 2016; Drozdov et al. 2022). Verification of this electron loss mechanism requires a combination of satellites near the equator (to measure the waves and equatorial pitch-angle electron fluxes) and at low-altitude (to measure precipitating electron fluxes).

Effects of Wave-particle Resonant Interactions

EMIC waves are generated by anisotropic ion populations from plasma sheet injections . These injections also create anisotropic “seed” electrons , the free energy source for whistler-mode chorus waves . Such chorus waves can effectively accelerate the same seed electrons to relativistic energies (Miyoshi et al. 2003; Thorne et al. 2013; Mourenas et al. 2014; Allison and Shprits 2020). Therefore, there is a competition between electron acceleration by whistler-mode waves (supported by direct adiabatic heating during injections, see, e.g. Sorathia et al. 2018) and electron precipitation by EMIC and chorus waves, and this competition should ultimately shape the energy spectrum of radiation belt electrons after a series of plasma sheet injections. Several recent publications indicate that the electron energy spectrum may have an upper limit of flux, corresponding to a balance between electron injections and precipitation loss, controlled by whistler-mode waves (Olifer et al. 2021, 2022). The existence of such an upper limit has been predicted by Kennel and Petschek (1966), and reevaluated for relativistic electrons by Summers, Tang, and Thorne (2009) and Summers and Shi (2014). Several of its main assumptions have been verified using ELFIN data (Mourenas et al. 2024). The Kennel-Petschek upper limit is based on the idea that injected electrons generate whistler-mode waves (with exponentially higher wave power for electron fluxes above the flux limit) that ultimately scatter these same injected electrons into the atmosphere. The competition between linearly increasing anisotropic electron fluxes and exponentially faster electron losses into the atmosphere due to exponentially increasing wave growth, leads to a stationary solution in the diffusion (Fokker-Planck) equation describing electron flux dynamics. Inclusion of EMIC wave-driven loss into this balance reduces the upper limit for the differential electron flux at high energy (Mourenas et al. 2022).

Role of EMIC Waves in Space Weather

Understanding the interactions between EMIC waves and radiation belt electrons is crucial for predicting space weather effects, particularly since these interactions can lead to rapid changes in radiation belt configurations, posing risks to satellites and other space-based technologies (Baker et al., 2004; Horne et al., 2005). The 2003 Halloween storm provided a clear example of how enhanced EMIC wave activity correlated with significant radiation belt electron flux decreases, highlighting the importance of including these waves in predictive models (Turner et al., 2012).

Gaps in Current Understanding

Despite significant advances, there remain substantial gaps in our understanding of what roles these waves, operating concurrently with other dynamic processes during plasma sheet injections, play in modifying these interactions with energetic particles. The proposed study aims to bridge these gaps by combining observational data analysis with theoretical modeling efforts.

Proposed Data and Detailed Analysis Approach

Data Acquisition and Sources

ELFIN CubeSat: Employ low-altitude measurements from the ELFIN CubeSat to quantify the effects of EMIC waves on electron precipitation. ELFIN’s unique orbital characteristics and full energy (16 channels within \([50,6000]\) keV) and pitch-angle (8 channels within \([0,180^\circ]\)) resolution allow it to measure loss cone distributions and provide a direct measure of wave-driven electron losses.

Van Allen Probes: Utilize extensive datasets from the Van Allen Probes, which include electric and magnetic field measurements, plasma wave spectra, and particle detection (electron and ion fluxes) across different energy ranges. These data are essential for directly observing EMIC waves and assessing their interactions with radiation belt electrons during different geomagnetic conditions.

ERG (Arase) Satellite: Draw upon high-resolution data from the ERG satellite, which offers crucial insights into the inner magnetosphere’s dynamics. ERG’s suite of instruments provides critical measurements of electron density, electric fields, and magnetic fields that help identify the conditions conducive to EMIC wave generation and propagation.

Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission: Analyze high-resolution data from the MMS mission, which is key for understanding the microphysics of wave-particle interactions, especially during short-duration events and smaller spatial scales that are not resolved by other satellites.

We highlight a candidate conjunction event, as illustrated in Figure 1. Equatorial and low-altitude satellites allow direct observations of electron loss due to scattering by EMIC and whistler-mode waves, electron acceleration by whistler-mode waves, and plasma sheet injections.

Figure 1: (top) An overview of the mission orbits recorded on April 17, 2021. The orbits of the various missions are projected onto the MLT and \(L\)-shell plane, using Tsyganenko model. (bottom) Sym-H and SME indices during this event.

Analysis Approach

First, we will identify specific events during which intense EMIC wave activity coincides with significant changes in electron fluxes. These events will be used as case studies to analyze the interaction mechanisms in detail, employing cross-spectral analysis to examine the coherence between EMIC waves and electron flux oscillations.

Figure 2: Two ELFIN CubeSats observations of EMIC wave-driven electron precipitation, where the precipitating flux reaches the trapped flux in high-energy channels, over an interval exceeding three hours, from 02:42 to 05:53 UT. The locations are projected to the equatorial L-Shell and MLT, using the Tsyganenko89 magnetic field model. Panels (a), (b), and (d) show data from ELFIN-B, while panel (c) features observations from ELFIN-A.

Figure 2 (adapted from Fig 5 of Angelopoulos et al. (2023)) shows a clear example of the EMIC wave-driven electron precipitation observed by ELFIN CubeSats. We observe a high precipitating-to-trapped flux ratio \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\) during four ELFIN orbits. Within \(L \in [5,6]\) there is a peak of precipitating-to-trapped flux ratio above \(300\) keV. This peak moves from \(L \sim 6\) around 02:45 UT to \(L \sim 5\) at 05:15 UT. Only EMIC wave-driven precipitation may have a low-energy cut-off of scattering fluxes around \(\sim 500\) keV, which is a typical minimum resonance energy for EMIC waves (see the identification of other EMIC wave-driven precipitation events with similar precipitating-to-trapped ratios in An et al. 2022; Angelopoulos et al. 2023). Note that the efficient precipitation (large \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\)) observed at \(L>6.5\) is likely due to a combination of whistler-mode wave-driven precipitation (Shi et al. 2022) and precipitation due to the curvature scattering (Wilkins et al. 2023), while precipitation of \(<300\) keV electrons at \(L<5\) is driven by whistler-mode wave scattering (see similar examples of quasi-periodical precipitation on the dusk flank in Artemyev et al. 2021). Therefore, Figure 2 demonstrates that during at least three hours, ELFIN observed continuous EMIC wave-driven losses of relativistic electrons. As \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\) for \(\sim\) 0.3–1 MeV electrons reaches one, the strong diffusion regime, one may expect a significant depletion of equatorial electron flux in this energy range, at least at low pitch-angles.

To further confirm the role of EMIC waves in driving electron precipitation, we will utilize phase space density calculations and quasi-linear theory to analyze how EMIC waves scatter radiation belt electrons into the loss cone, leading to precipitation. By quantifying the diffusion coefficients, we can better understand the rate and extent of changes in electron flux.

In the limit of near-equilibrium of the electron distribution near the loss-cone (Kennel and Petschek 1966) the average precipitating electron flux measured within the loss-cone by ELFIN CubeSats at low altitude, \(j_{prec}\), can be expressed as a function of the trapped flux measured at an equatorial pitch-angle \(5\)% above the loss-cone angle \(\alpha_{LC}\), denoted \(j_{trap}\) (Mourenas et al. 2023). In the ELFIN data products, \(j_{prec}\) is averaged over the loss cone weighted by solid angle, giving \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\approx 1.3/(z_0+z_0^2/200)\) with \(z_0=2\alpha_{LC}/(\tau_B D_{\alpha\alpha})^{1/2}\) and \(\tau_B\) the electron bounce period, valid for \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\in[0.001,0.85]\). Accordingly, \(D_{\alpha\alpha}\) at \(\alpha_0=\alpha_{LC}\) can be inferred from the measured ratio \(j_{prec}/j_{trap}\) at ELFIN, giving \(D_{\alpha\alpha} \approx \frac{{\alpha_{LC}^2}}{{2500\, \tau_B }} \left(\sqrt{1+ \frac{{ j_{trap} }}{{ 38.5\, j_{prec} }} } -1 \right)^{-2}\). The diffusion rates \(D_{\alpha\alpha}\) inferred, using the above Equation, from time-averaged ELFIN measurements of precipitating and trapped electron fluxes are displayed in Figure 3 for different electron energies and different \(L\). In the noon-dusk sector of the plasmaspheric plume, despite the theoretical impossibility of cyclotron resonance between 0.5-2 MeV electrons and typical EMIC wave frequencies, observed electron precipitation at these energies continues, particularly for low-energy electrons via scattering with high-frequency, low-amplitude H-band EMIC waves. These results suggest the presence of duskside EMIC wave bursts with peak amplitudes \(B_w\approx 0.5\) nT and a low-amplitude component at frequencies above those of peak-amplitude.

This estimate of electron lifetime by EMIC waves is based on analytical quasi-linear diffusion theory with realistic wave and plasma parameters, which allows us to simplify the dispersion relation and the diffusion coefficients. However, in general, quasi-linear diffusion by EMIC waves alone cannot lead to strong and fast dropouts of 2–6 MeV electrons up to high pitch angles, as there is no cyclotron resonance between these electrons and EMIC waves above the maximum resonance pitch angle \(\alpha_{0,\max}\). This prevents the majority of the electron population from being scattered toward the loss cone, except if the bottleneck in the bounce-averaged pitch angle diffusion rate \(D_{\alpha\alpha}(\text{EMIC})\) at high \(\alpha_0\) can be filled by other kinds of waves. Therefore, in the proposed study, we will extend the quasi-linear diffusion analysis to chorus waves and further investigate the combined effects of EMIC and chorus waves on radiation belt electrons. By utilizing the observed wave properties with the aid of theoretical predictions, we aim to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that drive electron dynamics during storm-time events.

Expected Contributions

This research project aims to advance our understanding of how EMIC or/and whistler waves influence radiation belt electrons. By integrating empirical data from multiple satellite sources with advanced theoretical modeling, we seek to establish a robust analytical framework capable of unraveling the complex interactions within Earth’s magnetosphere.

This will include detailed case studies where EMIC wave activity is correlated with significant changes in electron fluxes, enhancing our empirical understanding of these critical interactions. Specifically, we try to answer the following question:

How exactly do these waves together influence electron pitch angles and energies, and under what specific conditions do these interactions lead to net electron losses or gains?

Utilizing analytic diffusion coefficients for EMIC waves, chorus waves, or a combination thereof, we intend to ascertain the rate and extent of changes in electron fluxes during storm-time events and elucidate the role these waves play in driving electron precipitation.

Discussion and Future Work

The findings of this research will deepen our comprehension of radiation belt electron dynamics in the presence of multiple waves during storm time. However, several questions are likely to arise from this study, guiding future research efforts:

  • Wave Source Regions and Propagation: Further investigations may be required to identify the specific source regions of EMIC waves and their propagation characteristics through the magnetosphere. Understanding these aspects could enhance predictions of when and where EMIC waves will impact electron populations.

  • Interactions with Other Wave Modes: While this project focuses on EMIC waves, the magnetosphere contains multiple interacting wave modes. Future work could explore the interactions between EMIC waves and other wave types, such as ULF and VLF waves, to provide a more holistic view of the dynamics governing radiation belt electron fluxes.

Summary

The proposed research is designed to tackle some of the most pressing questions in space physics regarding the impact of EMIC&whistler waves on radiation belt dynamics. Through a combination of detailed empirical analysis and advanced theoretical modeling, this project aims to provide significant insights and tools for predicting space weather, thereby contributing to our ability to safeguard and optimize the operation of space-based technologies.

Figures

Figure 3: Panel (a) Diffusion rates \(D_{\alpha\alpha}\) of electrons near the loss-cone inferred, using Equation 2, from ELFIN measurements of precipitating and trapped electron fluxes in the dusk sector near 16 MLT, at \(L=5\) (solid red) and \(L=6\) (solid black) as a function of electron energy \(E\). Diffusion rates \(D_{\alpha\alpha}\) near the loss-cone evaluated based on analytical estimates for H-band EMIC waves with typical wave and plasma parameters at \(L=5\) (red) and \(L=6\) (black) in a noon-dusk plasmaspheric plume, as a function of energy \(E\) are shown for a typical ratio \(f_{pe}/f_{ce}=20\), a peak wave amplitude of \(B_w=0.5\) nT at \(\omega_{\text{EMIC}}/\Omega_{cp}\sim 0.4\), and a (minimum) frequency \(\omega_{\text{EMIC}}/\Omega_{cp}\sim 0.45\) for cyclotron resonance with \(\sim2\) MeV electrons (dashed lines). (b) Same as (a) with analytical estimates of \(D_{\alpha\alpha}\) shown for H-band EMIC waves with a peak wave amplitude of \(B_w=0.5\) nT at \(\omega_{\text{EMIC}}/\Omega_{cp}\sim 0.4\) and a (minimum) frequency \(\omega_{\text{EMIC}}/\Omega_{cp}\sim 0.7\) for cyclotron resonance with \(\sim0.75\) MeV electrons (dashed lines).

References

Allison, Hayley J., and Yuri Y. Shprits. 2020. “Local Heating of Radiation Belt Electrons to Ultra-Relativistic Energies.” Nature Communications 11 (September): 4533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18053-z.
An, Xin, Anton Artemyev, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Xiaojia Zhang, Didier Mourenas, and Jacob Bortnik. 2022. “Nonresonant Scattering of Relativistic Electrons by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves in Earth’s Radiation Belts.” Physical Review Letters 129 (September): 135101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.135101.
Angelopoulos, V., X. -J. Zhang, A. V. Artemyev, D. Mourenas, E. Tsai, C. Wilkins, A. Runov, et al. 2023. “Energetic Electron Precipitation Driven by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves from ELFIN’s Low Altitude Perspective.” Space Science Reviews 219 (August): 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-00984-w.
Artemyev, A. V., A. G. Demekhov, X. -J. Zhang, V. Angelopoulos, D. Mourenas, Yu V. Fedorenko, J. Maninnen, et al. 2021. “Role of Ducting in Relativistic Electron Loss by Whistler-Mode Wave Scattering.” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 126 (November): e29851. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029851.
Drozdov, A. Y., H. J. Allison, Y. Y. Shprits, M. E. Usanova, A. Saikin, and D. Wang. 2022. “Depletions of Multi-MeV Electrons and Their Association to Minima in Phase Space Density.” Geophysical Research Letters 49 (April): e97620. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL09762010.1002/essoar.10510085.1.
Glauert, Sarah A., and Richard B. Horne. 2005. “Calculation of Pitch Angle and Energy Diffusion Coefficients with the PADIE Code.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 110 (A4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010851.
Kennel, C. F., and H. E. Petschek. 1966. “Limit on Stably Trapped Particle Fluxes.” Journal of Geophysical Research (1896-1977) 71 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i001p00001.
Kersten, Tobias, Richard B. Horne, Sarah A. Glauert, Nigel P. Meredith, Brian J. Fraser, and Russell S. Grew. 2014. “Electron Losses from the Radiation Belts Caused by EMIC Waves.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 119 (11): 8820–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020366.
Ma, Q., W. Li, R. M. Thorne, B. Ni, C. A. Kletzing, W. S. Kurth, G. B. Hospodarsky, et al. 2015. “Modeling Inward Diffusion and Slow Decay of Energetic Electrons in the Earth’s Outer Radiation Belt.” Geophysical Research Letters 42 (4): 987–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062977.
Millan, R. M., and R. M. Thorne. 2007. “Review of Radiation Belt Relativistic Electron Losses.” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Global Aspects of Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, 69 (3): 362–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.019.
Miyoshi, Yoshizumi, Akira Morioka, Hiroaki Misawa, Takahiro Obara, Tsugunobu Nagai, and Yoshiya Kasahara. 2003. “Rebuilding Process of the Outer Radiation Belt During the 3 November 1993 Magnetic Storm: NOAA and Exos-D Observations.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 108 (A1): SMP 3-1-SMP 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA007542.
Mourenas, D., A. V. Artemyev, O. V. Agapitov, V. Krasnoselskikh, and W. Li. 2014. “Approximate Analytical Solutions for the Trapped Electron Distribution Due to Quasi-Linear Diffusion by Whistler Mode Waves.” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 119 (December): 9962–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020443.
Mourenas, D., A. V. Artemyev, Q. Ma, O. V. Agapitov, and W. Li. 2016. “Fast Dropouts of Multi-MeV Electrons Due to Combined Effects of EMIC and Whistler Mode Waves.” Geophysical Research Letters 43 (9): 4155–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068921.
Mourenas, D., A. V. Artemyev, X.-J. Zhang, and V. Angelopoulos. 2022. “Extreme Energy Spectra of Relativistic Electron Flux in the Outer Radiation Belt.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 127 (11): e2022JA031038. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031038.
———. 2023. “Upper Limit on Outer Radiation Belt Electron Flux Based on Dynamical Equilibrium.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 128 (8): e2023JA031676. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031676.
———. 2024. “Checking Key Assumptions of the Kennel-Petschek Flux Limit With ELFIN CubeSats.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 129 (2): e2023JA032193. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032193.
Olifer, L., I. R. Mann, S. G. Claudepierre, D. N. Baker, H. E. Spence, and L. G. Ozeke. 2022. “A Natural Limit to the Spectral Hardness of Worst Case Electron Radiation in the Terrestrial Van Allen Belt.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 127 (8): e2022JA030506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030506.
Olifer, L., I. R. Mann, A. Kale, B. H. Mauk, S. G. Claudepierre, D. N. Baker, H. E. Spence, and L. G. Ozeke. 2021. “A Tale of Two Radiation Belts: The Energy-Dependence of Self-Limiting Electron Space Radiation.” Geophysical Research Letters 48 (20): e2021GL095779. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095779.
Shi, Xiaofei, Xiao-Jia Zhang, Anton Artemyev, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Michael D. Hartinger, Ethan Tsai, and Colin Wilkins. 2022. “On the Role of ULF Waves in the Spatial and Temporal Periodicity of Energetic Electron Precipitation.” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 127 (December): e2022JA030932. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030932.
Sorathia, Kareem A., Aleksandr Y. Ukhorskiy, Viacheslav G. Merkin, Joseph F. Fennell, and Seth G. Claudepierre. 2018. “Modeling the Depletion and Recovery of the Outer Radiation Belt During a Geomagnetic Storm: Combined MHD and Test Particle Simulations.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123 (7): 5590–5609. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025506.
Summers, Danny, Binbin Ni, and Nigel P. Meredith. 2007a. “Timescales for Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration and Loss Due to Resonant Wave-Particle Interactions: 1. Theory.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 112 (A4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011801.
———. 2007b. “Timescales for Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration and Loss Due to Resonant Wave-Particle Interactions: 2. Evaluation for VLF Chorus, ELF Hiss, and Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 112 (A4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011993.
Summers, Danny, and Run Shi. 2014. “Limiting Energy Spectrum of an Electron Radiation Belt.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 119 (8): 6313–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020250.
Summers, Danny, Rongxin Tang, and Richard M. Thorne. 2009. “Limit on Stably Trapped Particle Fluxes in Planetary Magnetospheres.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 114 (A10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014428.
Summers, Danny, and Richard M. Thorne. 2003. “Relativistic Electron Pitch-Angle Scattering by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves During Geomagnetic Storms.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 108 (A4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009489.
Thorne, R. M., W. Li, B. Ni, Q. Ma, J. Bortnik, L. Chen, D. N. Baker, et al. 2013. “Rapid Local Acceleration of Relativistic Radiation-Belt Electrons by Magnetospheric Chorus.” Nature 504 (December): 411–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12889.
Wilkins, C., V. Angelopoulos, A. Runov, A. Artemyev, X. -J. Zhang, J. Liu, and E. Tsai. 2023. “Statistical Characteristics of the Electron Isotropy Boundary.” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 128 (October): e2023JA031774. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031774.